Which Scope for New Rifle

What is your intended purpose for the rifle? I am assuming hunting. How far do you intend to be shooting? If for hunting at what game?
Yes, hunting is the purpose for this rifle. The max range that I will be shooting is 400 yards, and I will be hunting pronghorn, whitetail, mule deer, and elk with this rifle. Thanks for the reply!
 
Yes, hunting is the purpose for this rifle. The max range that I will be shooting is 400 yards, and I will be hunting pronghorn, whitetail, mule deer, and elk with this rifle. Thanks for the reply!
This doesn't answer your question but I thought I might make a couple comments to give you something to consider when making your choice. 12, 16 or 18 power is a fair bit of magnification for shots up to 400 yards. Magnification is definitely a personal preference thing but there are certain aspects to a lot of magnification that can be a drawback to a hunting scope. At high magnification the field of view gets real small, the eye box on some scopes can be a little tight at high power and most ranging reticle only work at max power. These can be drawbacks at times. To put things in perspective I shot my deer last year at 503 yards with a rifle fitted with a vx5 2-10 power scope with cds dial. I dialed for 500 yards and it worked great. The other aspect to high power scopes is that they generally cost more. You can do a 400 yard shot with 6 or 8x scope without a problem. Personally I would get a smaller scope and get a better quality scope with better glass and lens coatings. Much more valuable in my opinion. Now, if I was setting up some type of canyon buster rifle where I knew I would be shooting over 500 yards I would take that extra magnification. Also, don't discount the dials. I have several scopes with dials as well as ranging reticle scopes from different companies and I think the dials are better. I find them to me more accurate so 'long as you send in accurate Info and they work at any magnification. Just some thoughts. Good luck..
 
Up to 400.....just put a viper hs 2.5-10 on it a 4-16 would be overkill, with all the money you save buy extra ammo and practice.
 
Magnification is personal preference, to a point.
I shot a 100 yard UBR type match this past spring. Used wife's Savage 110FP with a 6-18X44 Vortex.
Targets are small enough that even at 18 power, i was wishing for more magnification.

My most common scope for hunting is a 4-12 power. At 400 yards, the 12 power comes in handy. While i carry it with it set on 4 power.
Nothing says you have to have it set to max power all the time.
I also stay away from CDS.
I shoot more than one bullet weight for each caliber, for the given game intended.
With CDS, your pretty stuck to one bullet.
 
This doesn't answer your question but I thought I might make a couple comments to give you something to consider when making your choice. 12, 16 or 18 power is a fair bit of magnification for shots up to 400 yards. Magnification is definitely a personal preference thing but there are certain aspects to a lot of magnification that can be a drawback to a hunting scope. At high magnification the field of view gets real small, the eye box on some scopes can be a little tight at high power and most ranging reticle only work at max power. These can be drawbacks at times. To put things in perspective I shot my deer last year at 503 yards with a rifle fitted with a vx5 2-10 power scope with cds dial. I dialed for 500 yards and it worked great. The other aspect to high power scopes is that they generally cost more. You can do a 400 yard shot with 6 or 8x scope without a problem. Personally I would get a smaller scope and get a better quality scope with better glass and lens coatings. Much more valuable in my opinion. Now, if I was setting up some type of canyon buster rifle where I knew I would be shooting over 500 yards I would take that extra magnification. Also, don't discount the dials. I have several scopes with dials as well as ranging reticle scopes from different companies and I think the dials are better. I find them to me more accurate so 'long as you send in accurate Info and they work at any magnification. Just some thoughts. Good luck..
Thanks, that is some really good info! That definitely gives me some things to think about! Thanks for the reply!
 
Magnification is personal preference, to a point.
I shot a 100 yard UBR type match this past spring. Used wife's Savage 110FP with a 6-18X44 Vortex.
Targets are small enough that even at 18 power, i was wishing for more magnification.

My most common scope for hunting is a 4-12 power. At 400 yards, the 12 power comes in handy. While i carry it with it set on 4 power.
Nothing says you have to have it set to max power all the time.
I also stay away from CDS.
I shoot more than one bullet weight for each caliber, for the given game intended.
With CDS, your pretty stuck to one bullet.
This is a good point about dials assuming you are using a load specific dial which you don't have too. You can you use the standard dial but you need to know the drops which isn't too hard to figure out. I shoot the same bullet regardless so I use a custom dial that i don't have too switch out . You can also have more than one dial made. Lots of choices.
 
To paraphrase a quote from previous poster here, "lots of are over scoped and under bulleted"...

For only to 400yds, I'd go way less magnification, and would just settle on a simple hold over reticle.
Thanks for the reply and info. So if I bought less magnification, I could probably buy a Swarovski 4-12 for the same money as a lesser brand with more magnification. Is that what you would recommend?
 
Thanks for the reply and info. So if I bought less magnification, I could probably buy a Swarovski 4-12 for the same money as a lesser brand with more magnification. Is that what you would recommend?
I've upgraded from Vortex Crossfires, Diamondbacks and Vipers to Vortex Razor HD LH scopes on my rifles, 1.5-8 for WI whitetail woods, 2-10 for all around and 3-15 for open country. It's a second focal plane scope so to use the hold-over marks of the BDC reticle you need to have it dialed all the way up, and it's way easier to maintain your sight picture on target with lower magnification than a higher magnification - I have to be careful not to dial up the 3-15 all the way up if I'm not using the hold-over marks which for my set up is any shot within 300 yds, yet I don't expect to ever shoot beyond 400 yds. If I had only one rifle and one scope I'd use my 2-10 as it would work from the woods to 400+. Honestly, being able to go up to 15 power instead of only 10 power creates a more challenging shot based on my experience.
 
Thanks for the reply and info. So if I bought less magnification, I could probably buy a Swarovski 4-12 for the same money as a lesser brand with more magnification. Is that what you would recommend?

I would not. I am selling my Swaro scopes and replacing them with SWFAs. I am not convinced the optical clarity of the Swaros are any better than the SWFA HD series. Even if they are, it's too minor to ever make a difference in a legal hunting scenario. My eyes could not tell an advantage with the Swaros.

However, the durability of the SWFA, ability to maintain zero, and tracking reliability of the SWFA blow the Swaros out of the park. The mechanical properties of a scope are much more important for a hunting scope than the optical clarity.

To match or beat the mechanical performance of a SWFA will require you to go to something like Nightforce. For the type of reticles that you mentioned you prefer, SWFA would be your huckleberry.

Also, a fixed 6 or variable 3-9, 2-7, 2-10 range will more than suffice for shots much further than 400 yards.

YMMV. Good luck!
 
I'll give you a good example for higher power.
Shot a groundhog match today.
Again, used my wifes 223 Rem with the same Vortex 6-18X44 scope.
I did good at 100 & 200 yards.
Couldn't see bullet holes at 300 yards.
Because i couldn't see where i was hitting (white background) i didn't shoot at 400 yards.

I have used a 4-12X42 with success at 400 yards, with it set on 12 power. I probably wouldn't have shot with less.
 
Thanks for the reply and info. So if I bought less magnification, I could probably buy a Swarovski 4-12 for the same money as a lesser brand with more magnification. Is that what you would recommend?
There are a lot of good scopes In the 3-9, 2-10, 4-12 range. Swarovski has very nice glass. I do question their durability in the z3 line. I have a 3x9 z3 that I put on a 30-06 and I could never get it sighted in properly. I took it to the range several times but it was all over the place. Made me start questioning my shooting. Since I have been working less recently I have been trying to figure it out and it seems the scope is out of wack. I just sent it off to swarovski on fridsy to have it looked at. Based on my testing and correspondence with swarovski it had too much adjustment available so I suspect the erector assembly is broken. This surprised me as I've haven't shot it that much and never took it hunting. Some people have complained about similar issues while others have had no issue. Maybe i just got a lemon. I will say my favorite scope so far has been my leupold vx5 2-10 with cds and zero lock. I have found that scope to be the best for a general purpose rifle where short and long shorts (upto around 500 yards) may present themselves. I have also heard good things about those swfa scopes. I have a knowledgeable friend who swears by them and hates leupold. Lots of opinions on this topic.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply and info. So if I bought less magnification, I could probably buy a Swarovski 4-12 for the same money as a lesser brand with more magnification. Is that what you would recommend?
Wouldn't be what I'd buy, but if that checks off boxes for you, then go for it. You've said you want a mil-dot/BDC reticle. Find the one you like, then get the scope in the 3-9X range with that.
 
Just thought i'd note...
Please don't get me wrong, you don't NEED, heavy, expensive match quality optics for hunting.
And, yes, while you can make hits at longer distances with lower powered optics, it's not optimal.
You can't hit what you can't see, does hold true.
 
It's all a matter of personal preference. Getting a sound quality scope is the most important part of the decision. But one needs to understand the pros and cons of magnification and how it applies your particular style of hunting.

Magnification is not always your friend, and in some cases can be a handicap. The higher you go in magnification, the harder it will be for you to hold steady. Also, the higher you turn your magnification ring, the less light transmission you will have which will impact the last minute of daylight opportunities such finding the buck edging in a field at the edge of dark with your reticle. Also, when you get above 10x, parallax comes into play, which is another variable that can throw you off the inteneded target when things get exciting.

The point of being able to see a target to hit it is certainly valid. For long range target shooting, higher magnification is certainly warranted. I like higher magnification when shooting prairie dogs. I would often choose more, but typically the magnification is limited by mirage. Looking at a target 500 yards away on 9x is equivalent to looking at a target 55 yards away on 1x. With the OPs maximum range of 400 yards, thats the equivalent of 44 yards on 1x, which is easily obtainable on big game if the shooter can shoot straight enough. Just think how many turkey hunters are shooting 45 yards by use of the bead on a shotgun barrel.

The power ring on my big game variable scopes are always set on 5 or 6x, and typically only go higher when I am at the bench checking my zero. A majority of my shots are also under 200 yards, but occasionally reach out to beyond 400. Your style of hunting may require a completely different setup, or you may simply prefer more magnification. 😃
 
Just thought i'd note...
Please don't get me wrong, you don't NEED, heavy, expensive match quality optics for hunting.
And, yes, while you can make hits at longer distances with lower powered optics, it's not optimal.
You can't hit what you can't see, does hold true.
Heard that!
 
It's all a matter of personal preference. Getting a sound quality scope is the most important part of the decision. But one needs to understand the pros and cons of magnification and how it applies your particular style of hunting.

Magnification is not always your friend, and in some cases can be a handicap. The higher you go in magnification, the harder it will be for you to hold steady. Also, the higher you turn your magnification ring, the less light transmission you will have which will impact the last minute of daylight opportunities such finding the buck edging in a field at the edge of dark with your reticle. Also, when you get above 10x, parallax comes into play, which is another variable that can throw you off the inteneded target when things get exciting.

The point of being able to see a target to hit it is certainly valid. For long range target shooting, higher magnification is certainly warranted. I like higher magnification when shooting prairie dogs. I would often choose more, but typically the magnification is limited by mirage. Looking at a target 500 yards away on 9x is equivalent to looking at a target 55 yards away on 1x. With the OPs maximum range of 400 yards, thats the equivalent of 44 yards on 1x, which is easily obtainable on big game if the shooter can shoot straight enough. Just think how many turkey hunters are shooting 45 yards by use of the bead on a shotgun barrel.

The power ring on my big game variable scopes are always set on 5 or 6x, and typically only go higher when I am at the bench checking my zero. A majority of my shots are also under 200 yards, but occasionally reach out to beyond 400. Your style of hunting may require a completely different setup, or you may simply prefer more magnification. 😃
Thanks, for the info and knowledge. Will definitely consider all options!
 
GOHUNT Insider

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
111,197
Messages
1,950,825
Members
35,075
Latest member
ceemee63
Back
Top