sbhooper
Well-known member
IF the piece of land in question is actually surrounded by private land, I do not have issue with the lockout unless there is a road to it. If one section of public land is touching another section, to me it should illegal to block access. I don't care if it is exact on the spot corner to corner. If they are touching on a map, then they should be considered to be touching.
Oak, I am not trying to say that leases are the problem. I am just saying that the land-owners that hold those leases are blocking off access to land that is taxpayer owned and subsidized.
Oak, I am not trying to say that leases are the problem. I am just saying that the land-owners that hold those leases are blocking off access to land that is taxpayer owned and subsidized.