More elk in Bitterroot survey

What Map

Active member
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
1,147
Location
Bozone
I got this in a newsletter this morning.
*********************************************************

May 19, 2013 - 3:01 pm EDT

HAMILTON, Montana — An aerial survey by Montana officials has found an increase in the number of elk in the Bitterroot Valley.

The Ravalli Republic reports (http://bit.ly/12ESDiD) that this year's spring count found 7,373 elk in the five hunting districts surrounding the Bitterroot Valley.

Mike Thompson of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks said it's the fourth highest number of elk counted in the 48-year history of the annual survey. It follows a series of disappointing surveys, including last year's that found 6,238 elk.

"We've had a pulse this year," he said. "It's a hopeful sign. We've seen that kind of variation in elk populations before. You achieve that kind of bump in population numbers with higher calf production and survival."

Biologists said they counted 25 calves per 100 cows in the Bitterroot Valley, the highest number since 2008. Calf survival was especially good in the southern part of the valley.

Bull elk numbers, meanwhile, have remained at about 11 per 100 cows since 2008.

"It's OK biologically," Thompson said. "There are enough bulls to take care of the breeding, but it's not really good. The reason the bull numbers are low is the problem with low recruitment over the past years. If calves don't survive, bull elk numbers won't grow."

Wildlife officials have been trying to increase elk numbers by restricting hunting of elk and increasing hunting of bears, wolves and mountain lions. He noted the drop in elk calf survival wasn't tied to hunting.

"Those cow/calf ratios went to low levels that we had never seen before," he said. "It was a trigger. We made a conscious decision after that to really restrict hunting because there was not enough surplus to support it. We wanted to keep as many maternal cows on the ground as we could."

An "Elk Summit" is planned Tuesday at the Bitterroot River Inn where Thompson said information about elk in the valley will be shared.

He said the agency's future strategy is to continue building the area's elk herd, which could eventually lead to allowing more opportunity for hunters.

"At first blush, we're seeing the elk population can respond," he said. "We want to conserve that pulse just in case we end up with a bad summer or winter before we take another jump forward.

"We do all of this with the goal to try to reintroduce more hunting back into the Bitterroot eventually," Thompson said. "We want to get it back to the way that it used to be so we can hunt in a sustainable fashion that we can count on year after year."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Information from: Ravalli Republic, http://www.ravallirepublic.com
 
Remember that last summer 345,000 acres of forest just over the hill along the Salmon river burnt. When Craig J. flew, there was a large herd of elk with no collars. (Our 3 year on going study). We think that a bunch of those Idaho elk came over for winter eats.

The bad news is 270 (East Fork) didn't have any improvement in bull:cow, or calf:cow ratios. The good news was we are 1000 head of elk over there. A record number of elk were counted on the largest ranch that doesn't allow public hunting (CB Ranch).

HD 250 showed improvement also. We got aggressive on cats, and had good harvest of bears,and wolves. The calf ratios: went way up there. 33:100. That will bring the elk numbers up faster than anything else.
 
Why are they proposing to cut the cat quota almost in half?

That was part of plan that came about from a model the Department has. We agreed and pushed for a plan to reduce the cat numbers by 30% of what ever their population was.

After last year, (the first of three in the model), we took a good number of cats. The department figured we had around 140 cats in this area.

We (RCF&Wass) also help fund a cat density study in the upper Root. The Department figured that high or low, on the guess, they would clean up the numbers in the 3rd year. Might of been the best money we ever spent.

Our cat population might be a lot higher than previously figured, so that harvest quota number, very well could change this week (deadline for proposals). They don't want to have to have a mass slaughter on the 3rd year just to reach the 30% reduction we had hoped would take place.

We're having a public meeting on the results tomorrow night, and hope to have new data.
 
It is a bit of postive news. The ratio's are still a big problem. Bull/cow ratio hovering around 10 is not good. Calves in the 20's will not be enough.

Lots of work yet to be done.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
111,414
Messages
1,957,941
Members
35,168
Latest member
sbaker
Back
Top