Half Extinct Species in Hawaii

ELKCHSR

New member
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Messages
13,765
Location
Montana
This is very interesting, as I read it, they lay the blame on Fish and Wildlife, but then again, won't pass on enough funds for the Fish and Wildlife to do what it is that is expected. The way I see it, if some of the Environmentalist groups that are cash flush, were to donate the millions it would take to get this stuff thru, instead of some of the things they do spend it on, then I believe these organizations would be putting their money where their mouths are. :D

Science - AP

Nearly Half Extinct Species Were in Hawaii
By RON STATON, Associated Press Writer

HONOLULU - Nearly half of the 114 species that have become extinct in the first 20 years of the federal Endangered Species Act were in Hawaii, according to a new report by an advocacy group.

The report by the Center for Biological Diversity says the federal government's failure to protect species "has been spectacular" and accuses the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service of knowingly delaying listings "to avoid political controversy even when it knew the likely result would be the extinction of the species."

A statement from the Fish and Wildlife Service said the agency "denies the inflammatory claim" and challenged the accuracy of the report. It said recovery of species is a very long process and noted that at the time the act was passed in 1973 that some species were in such bad shape the agency couldn't recover them.

The agency said funding has been limited because of litigation over critical habitat and noted that fish and wildlife habitat has been declining for decades because of urbanization.

The report released Wednesday said "the number (of extinct species) is shocking and indicates a grave failure in federal management of the nation's most powerful environmental law." A co-author of the report said that with so many unique species, Hawaii faces the worst problem in the country.

Species lost from the islands include the large Kauai thrush, which once was the most common bird on the island; the Molokai thrush, which was endemic to Molokai, and 11 species of Oahu tree snails.

Only 19 percent of the extinctions involved species on the endangered list, showing that the 1973 law is working — at least for species that make the list, said Kieran Suckling, the center's executive director and a co-author of the report.

"But species known to be endangered were stuck in bureaucratic delay and went extinct before they had a chance to be listed," Suckling said. "That should never have happened."

Nearly all the species could have been saved if the Endangered Species Act had been properly managed, fully funded and "shielded from political pressure," he said. "Instead they were sacrificed to bureaucratic inertia, political meddling, and lack of leadership."

The report lays much of the blame on the Fish and Wildlife Service.

"Listing delays and extinctions have plagued the Fish and Wildlife Service for 30 years, but the Bush administration has pushed the crisis to an unprecedented level," said Brian Nowicki, another co-author of the report.

The statement from the Fish and Wildlife Service said part of the problem the agency faces in its listing backlog "stem from 1995 — when a complete moratorium on listing took in effect.

"The funding for the Endangered Species listing program — in which species are listed as threatened or endangered — has shrunk to only a little more than $3 million per year.

"This is because litigation over critical habitat designations has forced almost all the service's funding to be directed toward critical habitat at the expense of listing."

Hawaii is unique not only because it has 52 species on the list, but because state law requires that every species placed on the list is automatically added to a state list, said Michael Buck, administrator of the Forestry and Wildlife division of the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, which works in partnership with the Fish and Wildlife Service.

He acknowledged, however, that "just getting something on the list does not save endangered species." The No. 1 issue for Hawaii, Buck said, is "coming up with resources and public support."

California was the next highest state in the report with 11 extinctions. Guam had eight, while Alabama and Texas each had seven.

Fifteen of Hawaii's extinct species were terrestrial snails, 13 each were flowering plants and insects, eight were birds and three were moths. Birds accounted for all but two of the extinctions on the U.S. territory of Guam, where the bird population already had been devastated by the brown tree snake and other predators.

The four-angled pelea, a flowering plant endemic to Kauai, is an example of a species being lost by inaction, Suckling said.

The Fish and Wildlife Service became aware it was endangered in 1975 when the Smithsonian petitioned to have it listed, he said. The following year, the agency said it would propose adding it to the list, but when nothing happened, the Smithsonian re-petitioned in 1978, he said.

In 1980, the Fish and Wildlife Service agreed the plant was endangered but put it on the candidate list, Suckling said. In 1994, the agency listed it as endangered, but it had become extinct in 1991, he said.

"The extinction crisis in Hawaii is worse than anywhere else," Suckling said. "We believe the Fish and Wildlife Service should have no higher job than preventing species from going extinct."

Buck said extinctions have been occurring since Western sailors first discovered the islands in 1778.

The extinction rate probably has increased in the past 10 years, Suckling said. "There is no reason to believe it went down," he said.
 
Originally posted by ELKCHSR:
This is very interesting, as I read it, they lay the blame on Fish and Wildlife, but then again, won't pass on enough funds for the Fish and Wildlife to do what it is that is expected. The way I see it, if some of the Environmentalist groups that are cash flush, were to donate the millions it would take to get this stuff thru, instead of some of the things they do spend it on, then I believe these organizations would be putting their money where their mouths are. :D

Why on earth would it be the responsiblity of the Environmental groups to fund the Fish and Wildlife Service to protect speces being endangered by an area that "has been declining for decades because of urbanization."?

Nearly all the species could have been saved if the Endangered Species Act had been properly managed, fully funded and "shielded from political pressure," he said. "Instead they were sacrificed to bureaucratic inertia, political meddling, and lack of leadership."

The report lays much of the blame on the Fish and Wildlife Service.

"Listing delays and extinctions have plagued the Fish and Wildlife Service for 30 years, but the Bush administration has pushed the crisis to an unprecedented level," said Brian Nowicki, another co-author of the report.
 
Yep, they may have been sacrificed for political gain or what ever the reason, these enviromental groups have the money and the pull with the media to go after really important issues, if in fact they are really that important. But then again, there isn't much any thing news worthy about trying to save a snail on some island now is there.
Urbanization is going to happen, one way these organizations that have millions in their coffers could "save" some of these speices is to buy the land when it becomes available. Then they can do with it what they want.
 
Are you that dense to think that these Environmental groups have the resources and cash to go around buying land in Hawaii, the most expensive Real Estate in the US???

Do you have any idea how difficult it is to raise money in a non-profit organization? Why would then want to spend the money to protect the land, when a much better way would be to force Dubya to enforce the laws (remember, he "swore" to do so at his innaugaration)?

You want somebody with "money and pull", go look up Halliburton and their influence with Dubya/Cheney..... These two make Clinton's rental of the Lincoln bedroom look like a Mom and Pop roadside Motel....
 
Then I guess we will be dealt with the urban sprawl and extinction of these plants and animals then won't we...
 
TNC, RMEF, and a host of others are doing exactly that, buying land. Not everyplace can be saved, and I'd imagine that Hawaii is low on the priority list. Many of the plants in animals on Hawaii are non-native and have been for some time. I think groups are focusing on places more 'natural'.
 
Yeah, who cares about Hawaii anyway? :confused:

Elkchaser, if you have the time (and I'm sure you do) read this:

http://www.rmef.org/bugle/pages/04JF/JF04asotin.html

It's an article about 8500 acres the RMEF bought in southeast Washington for elk and other wildlife.

See, as a hunter you can give your money to the RMEF, yet not be seen as some pussy environmentalist by all your friends. ;)
 
That is a very good article, and if these things are going to be done, they need to be managed properly and it looks like this one is, plus it is a place for hunters to come in and have a great time in a great atmospher...
Thanks for the find Bob...good read...
 
Ollin Magnetic Digiscoping Systems

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
111,177
Messages
1,950,123
Members
35,067
Latest member
CrownDitch
Back
Top