WoodsQuest
Member
I currently have a Burris Fullfield E1 3-9x40 that I find very reliable and the clarity / image quality / light transmission seems to be very good. I don't have a ton of disposable income so $300 or less for optics is where I'm at. A few years ago I picked up a Nikon Prostaff 7s 10x42 bino that I really think was a heck of a great buy. When I bought the Nikon it was the one time money wasn't much of an object and I had about $500 to spend on them. I still picked the $200 Nikons over some $350 binos from other brands. I need a second riflescope and thought about getting a Nikon Prostaff P3, 3-9x50 or Prostaff P5 2.5-10x42SF. The P5 has a side focus parallax adjustment, which given where I hunt probably would never be used. I can't seem to find any definitive answers about which riflescope is "better". It seems that question results in many subjective answers. I do not know a lot about optics, but would appreciate the opinions from those who have used one or all of the riflescope I've listed. If the Nikon is inferior I could easily grab another Burris since I like the one I have. Thanks for taking the time to read/respond.