Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Total BS. The law on corner hopping needs to be overturned as well. That would allow us hunters to access OUR lands.
So is this the big timber creek access or another?
IMO no land swap should be considered. Given the 100 years of use/maintenance a prescriptive easement is warranted.
Maybe others know better, but if pushed I assume the legislature could pass a law clarifying that corner crossing is illegal.Don't think it's ever happened in MT. I think the only way for us to get an answer would be for someone to be cited for it and then fight it all the way up.
Don't think it's ever happened in MT. I think the only way for us to get an answer would be for someone to be cited for it and then fight it all the way up.
Seems like the FS has the documentation necessary to back this claim up. If they want to sue, then folks need to pony up to PLWA so they can intervene and have their lawyers kick some butt.
Yes, right through the middle of private.I am very familiar with this area access is tough in tough country also. The langus family are some super nice folks. I do wish the whole corner crossing issue would be solved. But in this particular case the way I read it and what I know of the area it's not so much of a corner cross issue as it is the maps showing trails right through the middle of private. Is that right? There are several of these trails I've found on east side of this range such as these two that go right through private lands and are numbered fs trails.
The argument against corner crossing is how do you corner cross without trespassing? A person would person would have to cross the fence onto private ground and then cross the fence to get back into public. Someone else will have to explain how you could cross without setting foot on private ground and trespassing.