Neat thread. I like the forester idea above and you may have done that or considered it. I guess if you've worked with the soil district, you may have already inquired of the MN County Extension (maybe the same thing?)-. here, they do next-level 4H research and are usually very helpful to the...
To the end of my post above- Imagine getting an increase of property taxes from about $1,000 to $5,500 and that same official passes off like a generous saint by offering you a $675 property and $1,350 income tax rebate. smh
Whoa, I just read about Montana's property tax increase. I'm surprised they aren't trying to impeach your governor.
After they issued those meteoric tax increases, the governor's office issued some next-level spin:
A spokesperson for Gianforte said the governor delivered historic tax relief...
Couldn’t have made it more confusing by combining two (2) issues just because they had the same court date:
How Fred Eshelman was misled in the purchase of his land and refused to admit corner-crossing transgender student Artemis Langford. At issue in the corner crossing case is whether a...
Here are some specific questions that likley have answers that relate to the macro topics already discussed on this thread.
The proposals for 2024 include a split of Area 54 and creation of a new Elk Area '65' which appears to deal with a heavy presence of elk on rancher land in that flat area...
WY will probably mark it Designated Wilderness since our federal tax dollars were used to buy it. That way WY gets all the money and reserves it for residents and guides.
To the rest of America, WY thanks you. Now get the hell off my lawn!
If the special draw increase has any impact on slowing point creep, 2024 will be the best time to spend the extra coin. Do it now before the sticker shock wears off.
Lust for big elk horns will eventually overtake most and then WY will increase the special tag price again.
Edit:
@hogcarpy...
Precisely ... :
'Skavdahl wrote that Eshelman’s claims of lost property value caused by the judgment were misguided. Such a claim “is based on a fictitious right the Plaintiff never actually held under law,” the judge wrote.'