Were you paying attention to his actions on the land board and the The Horse Creek easement?
MT Senator race: Public Lands
- Thread starter Sytes
- Start date
Were you paying attention to his actions on the land board and the The Horse Creek easement?
Or Keogh, or...
The actions of Rosendale & his team on Horse Creek were not only ant-sportsmen, but they were anti-landowner as well. Forcing language that is tied to statute into a conservation easement means that the landowners - in perpetuity - will have to remain in a situation where they cannot force a negotiation for surface use agreements regardless of future changes of the law. In the case of Horse Creek - they gave industry a major gift by insisting on putting that language in there.
onpoint
Well-known member
Having been one to habitually take part in these "yet no minds were changed" topics, I fully understand the compulsion to chime in. Anymore, at age 55, I am losing interest in hoping anything I say or do can/will sway another's view - especially a political one. And I am quickly losing my ability to care.
I initially joined this forum because of the phrase "Hunttalk is a forum for on your own hunters. Hunters who prefer to hunt without guides on public lands". That's still about the only reason I even watch this site anymore. I am a DIY PUBLIC Land Hunter who gives a shit about it. I am continually - but less and less all the time - fascinated by people who come on here and actually spout crap that is counter to the public lands interests this site seems to be all about.
But screw 'em. I will unashamedly vote for the likes of Tester and Kathleen Williams, because realistically or not, I believe people like them will better address and attempt to take care of the issues I care about.
If the "Sytes" of the world want to vote for the Rosendales who claim to want to protect us podunk Montanans from dreaded sanctuary cities and the erosion of our constitutionally protected rights, give most of us $13 more in our paychecks, and claim that the most important part of the Public Lands issue is "access to them for all" - knock yourself out. We are where we are politically - I wish us all luck...
I think these pics depict some of the only stuff that actually draws us "like minded individuals" (as Randy once described this site to me) to an internet place like this. Hope all have a good upcoming hunting season, even if I think you are "misinformed" (attempting to keep it civil).
All pics were taken on PUBLIC LANDS. Thanks to all who actually put work into keeping this PRIVILEGE for all of us.
I initially joined this forum because of the phrase "Hunttalk is a forum for on your own hunters. Hunters who prefer to hunt without guides on public lands". That's still about the only reason I even watch this site anymore. I am a DIY PUBLIC Land Hunter who gives a shit about it. I am continually - but less and less all the time - fascinated by people who come on here and actually spout crap that is counter to the public lands interests this site seems to be all about.
But screw 'em. I will unashamedly vote for the likes of Tester and Kathleen Williams, because realistically or not, I believe people like them will better address and attempt to take care of the issues I care about.
If the "Sytes" of the world want to vote for the Rosendales who claim to want to protect us podunk Montanans from dreaded sanctuary cities and the erosion of our constitutionally protected rights, give most of us $13 more in our paychecks, and claim that the most important part of the Public Lands issue is "access to them for all" - knock yourself out. We are where we are politically - I wish us all luck...
I think these pics depict some of the only stuff that actually draws us "like minded individuals" (as Randy once described this site to me) to an internet place like this. Hope all have a good upcoming hunting season, even if I think you are "misinformed" (attempting to keep it civil).
All pics were taken on PUBLIC LANDS. Thanks to all who actually put work into keeping this PRIVILEGE for all of us.
When Tester gets re elected all of us that aren’t that fond of him should take a moment to acknowledge how extreme Rosemdale is and that it didn’t have to be that way.
We could have had Russ Fagg
Rosendale is Hillary Clinton: repulsive, unlikeable amd unelectable. Screeching voice and all.
We could have had Russ Fagg
Rosendale is Hillary Clinton: repulsive, unlikeable amd unelectable. Screeching voice and all.
Onpoint... sure... Many read though do not post. Those who post are typically already decided, such as your Democrat friend Tony... for the most part though occasionally we do pick up a thing or two here and there.
Going to personally attack the person again? Question whether I hunt or fish? question who I voted for in the past?
You think a republican would have voted for clueless Quist? I did (As an Independent)... took a pic of the ballot as well... guess why? Public Lands. Want to question me further? Take it to PM's unless you need more of your brethren to pat you on the back.. heh!
So I am anti - from the great onpoint when I may vote in opposition to your partisan ways yet...
Cheers Onpoint... you are a bit Off point, yet again...
Going to personally attack the person again? Question whether I hunt or fish? question who I voted for in the past?
You think a republican would have voted for clueless Quist? I did (As an Independent)... took a pic of the ballot as well... guess why? Public Lands. Want to question me further? Take it to PM's unless you need more of your brethren to pat you on the back.. heh!
So I am anti - from the great onpoint when I may vote in opposition to your partisan ways yet...
Clueless musician - Democrat puppet vs deceptive, arrogant, public land thief.
Cheers Onpoint... you are a bit Off point, yet again...
Last edited:
You know nothing about me Charles so I will ask you to keep me out of your stupidity. I have been involved in public land and wildlife issues in Montana long before you jumped on the bandwagon.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 20812
Guest
Word. I appreciate all Tim, and people like him, have done and stand for.
And you know my public lands stance and wildlife preservation / hunting history how, Tony? You questioning my background just as much as I commented about you as a Democrat? Am I wrong? Nice try.
Never seen you in Helena Charles, not once at the legislature, not once at a FWP meeting, not once at a commission meeting. Maybe I missed the day you were there but I doubt it.
I never mentioned your name in any post but I agree with what Tim said so before you label me anything you best educate yourself. Guys like Tim did the heavy lifting that many enjoy now. The man deserves respect.
Carry on.
I never mentioned your name in any post but I agree with what Tim said so before you label me anything you best educate yourself. Guys like Tim did the heavy lifting that many enjoy now. The man deserves respect.
Carry on.
Last edited:
Best to you, Tony. I am glad you fight to preserve public lands...
The rest edited... Off topic. I have, as shown in the prior post, that I vote as an Independent. most times with the D's in MT, be it Governors or Tester, himself... even Clueless Quist (great music, btw)
The rest edited... Off topic. I have, as shown in the prior post, that I vote as an Independent. most times with the D's in MT, be it Governors or Tester, himself... even Clueless Quist (great music, btw)
Last edited:
HighDesertSage
Well-known member
LMAO, That's epic. Damn federal gubment.
Very much appreciate this post.
RobG
Well-known member
The only groups I see working the primaries are the dark money folks and that’s how we get these guys.
Southern Elk
Well-known member
I think this is true. Most of the money in the primary was behind Rosendale. Who do you think he will work for if he gets to Washington? It won't be for ordinary folks like us.
I agree with what others have said above. I vote on actions not promises. Rosendale has not shown one instance where he was pro public land.
aaron_a
New member
Nailed it. These rosendale ads are all put out by national super pacs.
It's kind of wild to me that so many people see Tester as a too far left. He seems pretty solidly in the center from what I've seen.
Schaaf
Well-known member
Sytes, could you provide one example of Rosendale being halfway decent on public lands before his Senate campaign started?
Schaaf,
I know you sought one though figured I would placed a few "halfway decent" moves for public land within his Land Board capacity.
******************************
Schaaf
Well-known member
Before his Senate campaign started. He’s been running for Senator since the second he stepped foot in the Auditors office.
He was a legislator for over 8 years. If he’s as moderate as you say that should be no problem.
He was a legislator for over 8 years. If he’s as moderate as you say that should be no problem.
Schaaf,
Do politicians adjust their stance to adapt to their constituent base? Examples abound... From Tester to well, any and likely every politician.
These examples over the past few years shared in the prior post match that same setting, unless you are holding the Republican to a different standard than Democrats?
From the article shared in the OP.
