PrairieHunter
Well-known member
I agree. With only 10 days to hunt it would be easy to rush into shooting an animal that wasn't male.
Also very interesting to see that happens on the residency requirements. Antis sometimes miss details like that.
WY Grizz
- Thread starter TheDudeAbides
- Start date
I agree. With only 10 days to hunt it would be easy to rush into shooting an animal that wasn't male.
Also very interesting to see that happens on the residency requirements. Antis sometimes miss details like that.
AvidIndoorsman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2015
- Messages
- 18,411
Troy Downing learned that one the hard way. Would be pretty funny if a bunch of people got fined for various license violations.
2rocky
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2010
- Messages
- 4,968
For Years, we have told the Non hunting public we as hunters funded wildlife management because of tag fees and Pittman Robertson excise taxes. Well now the non and anti hunting activists are doing that by buying tags and licenses. Ok.......Now what?
Folks, our bet has been called. Are we gonna raise them?
Folks, our bet has been called. Are we gonna raise them?
Lonesome_God_outdoors
Active member
Get them to buy duck stamps, conservation stamps, and get 2% for conservation certified!
Schaaf
Well-known member
Need a couple people to decide 6k is too much money..
shootbrownelk
Well-known member
We'll have to ask Liz Cheney how she managed to claim residency, then get pinched for buying a resident fishing license when she wasn't a legal resident.
rmyoung1
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2010
- Messages
- 2,320
Seriously... how long until someone harvests a sow? Two bears into the hunt? Three? Maybe four? I can’t see it lasting very long. All this stuff about shooting them with cameras isn’t gonna matter. The hunt will close rather quickly, I’m guessing. It’s just too rare of an opportunity and bears aren’t exactly the easiest things to judge. I’m thinking it’ll be easy for a hunter to be like, “Uhh. I dunno.” (Shrug) BANG! It’s gonna be really hard to convince the lucky recipient of a once-in-many-lifetimes tag not to do something that’s perfectly legal. I’d be surprised if hunter #5 gets to use the tag.
Last edited:
3855WIN
Well-known member
A few tag applications isn’t paying the freight like hunters who buy millions of tags per year.
PrairieHunter
Well-known member
lol
D
Deleted member 20812
Guest
Make the season longer, or go strictly off of quota. This isn’t the end of the world, and Rome wasn’t built in a day. Pretty tough to mandate folks needing to be hunters to apply as you can get a hunter ed card pretty easily.
Irrelevant
Well-known member
apparently they have two tags. https://www.gofundme.com/shoot039em...ail&utm_content=cta_button&utm_campaign=upd_n
averagebrooutdoors
New member
Anti hunters have been applying for tags in Alaska for a while now because if they draw the tag they don't have to pay for it if they don't actually hunt. So they just have to buy a hunting license and pay the $5 application fee. It seems to be catching more steam with this griz hunt though. I see them talking about getting more and more people to apply in the future. If they care for animals so much why don't they apply for elk, deer, and antelope tags? Oh wait, they only care about carnivores.
Coach Chris
Member
They don't care about the animals. They don't care about facts, stats, ecology or data. These same people virtue signal on Facebook about the environment while heliskiing in New Zealand. They're hypocrites.
They care about demonizing the Trump administration, conservative voters, republicans and what they care about most is highly publicized virtue signaling. If the delisting happened under the previous administration they would have paid no attention to it.
You can bet if a grizzly killed their dog or interrupted their day in any way they would want them culled.
