D
Deleted member 20812
Guest
I would bracket this load by 0.25 increments and see what they do.
I.e 44.25, 44.5, 44.75 hypothetical charge weights.
Would you hunt with these handholds?
- Thread starter golfer
- Start date
I would bracket this load by 0.25 increments and see what they do.
I.e 44.25, 44.5, 44.75 hypothetical charge weights.
Addicting
Well-known member
Here is a seating test done on my 6.5 Creedmoor. Measurements are jump from the lands. At .065 it started tightening ( had a bad case that closed hard causing a flyer). And started growing at .075. With .070 giving the best group which measures .650 edge to edge at 100 yards. Hope that helps.
std7mag
Well-known member
Seating deeper may be your ticket.
I had heard that the Accubond likes a good jump.
I had heard that the Accubond likes a good jump.
Brian in Montana
Well-known member
Don't have a 6.5 Manbun but when working on a load for my 7-08 I did find the Accubonds shot a little better with a little jump. I'd have to look at notes but I believe I settled on 2.77 as being most accurate, all else being equal.
Small groups are cool-I agree with that. Knowing how much you like the accubond, would you suggest seating them a bit deeper than what the nosler manual recommends?
Addicting
Well-known member
41g is the max load published in the Nosler book and I saw no signs of pressure. I am very happy with my groups with that recipe.
Last edited:
Addicting
Well-known member
You are correct, but if he is already hand loading why not keep tinkering to see what the rifle will do. In the long run he is just building confidence with the rifle.
"Every rifle is different". That's a given. I've never paid attention to any "recommendations" regarding seating depth of any bullet for my rifles. What my rifle likes, yours might not. mtmuley
noharleyyet
Well-known member
....fess up, you wouldn't hunt with those groups now. The longer one handloads, the wackier one gets...tsb.
You got me......mtmuley
The last part of that statement is the truth!
Bigjay73
Well-known member
As you seat deeper, your pressure will more than likely rise, and you may have to knock the charge down a bit. If this is an AR, pressure signs won't be as obvious as on a bolt gun. Just have to be a little more aware as you seat deeper. O notice it in the recoil and on the chronograph on my ARs when I'm pushing the limits.
BrentD
Well-known member
Why would you NOT hunt with that load? What's wrong with it?
Bigjay73
Well-known member
Because most people that handload these days are obsessed with 1/2" groups. I am as guilty as anyone. We forget that a factory hunting rifle that shoots 1" groups is pretty darn good.
BrentD
Well-known member
most people forget that big game animals do not have 1 MOA vitals and they can always stalk closer. Hunting is about hunting, not shooting. Competitions are about shooting. I was doing that all day today. Great fun, but that's not what hunting is about.
cahunter805
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 27, 2014
- Messages
- 2,463
Golfer
Have you measured the OAL of your magazine? It might be longer than what Nosler recommends.
I would load up some test rounds at 2.72,2.67,2.62,2.57 and test them. Also if your magazine allows I would test 2.82 and 2.87.
Have you measured the OAL of your magazine? It might be longer than what Nosler recommends.
I would load up some test rounds at 2.72,2.67,2.62,2.57 and test them. Also if your magazine allows I would test 2.82 and 2.87.
Rifles And More
New member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2018
- Messages
- 20
I would practice with that load, chronograph every time out and get to know it inside and out.
Yes, I would hunt with it.
Don't get lost in chasing the smallest group possible and give up time getting to know your rifle/load.
-Dustin
Yes, I would hunt with it.
Don't get lost in chasing the smallest group possible and give up time getting to know your rifle/load.
-Dustin
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
Little things that bother you. OCD or poor design?- Latest: 44hunter45
-
