A lack of science?

Northwoods Labs · Mar 16, 2018

COEngineer said:
Quick google search shows that the "researcher" is from a group that is anti-hunting, so hardly unbiased. They looked for four "hallmarks" of scientific management including "independent review." Where's the independent review of their "research?" Something smells funny about this article.

Normally I am not one to immediately jump to these kinds of conclusions (that of wildlife researchers being anti-hunting). However, if you are talking about Adrian Treves, then yea I would say your statement is pretty accurate

CampRipleyLF · Mar 16, 2018

1_pointer said:
I like this guy!!

I also agree that the general public, and that includes the hunting public, has a weak understanding of science. And an even weaker understanding of statistics used in the science.

Second

SO7mm · Apr 8, 2018

The North American model may not be perfect and could use more data but it's hard to argue with the majority or the results. As it's already been said this seems like nothing more than an ant-huinting group trying to discredit the model.

A lack of science?

Northwoods Labs

Well-known member

CampRipleyLF

Active member

SO7mm

Well-known member

Similar threads

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Share this page