270 Win barrel length

RkyMtnELK

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Messages
48
Location
New Mexico
Question on barrel length, I like the Howa 1500, 22" bbl. with the Hogue stock. Weatherby Vanguard has a 24" bbl. it has a generic synthetic stock. The rifle will be used for Elk and Oryx, if a permit can be drawn. Also some 300 + yard hole punching. New Mexico will be the place of use. Any comments ? Thanks, Jerry
 
If you like the 22, go with it, I don't think the 270 win benefits significantly from an additional 2". In general certain magnums perform better with a 24 or even 26, but also with todays powders that's not as necessary as it was in the 40's-50's and 60's when many chamberings were developed.
 
Great choice. The ol' 270 has lost some love to the 6.5s and 7 mms, but it remains an excellent option for 30-06 power w better ballistics and less recoil. IMO it is a better choice for elk-size game than the 6.5s, and is faster than 7-08 w same weight bullets. I tried 160, 150, and settled on 140 gr partition bullets for elk @ ranges to 300+ yds. Other rifles prefer monos or bonded bullets. For longer shots @ elk-size game, my 7 RM is ballistically the 270 plus 100 yards, w any bullet weight. A light 270 will throw some recoil, so a quality pad is helpful. Good luck. BTW, 22 in. barrel on my Stevens 200 270, very handy size.
 
I have a 22" barrel on my 270. I wish that it had a 24" barrel on it everytime I shoot it.
 
I have 22 inch 270's and they are just find. If you are a paper junkie, as in, just need every gun to look best on ballistic charts, than the 24 inch tube will give a little more velocity theoretically. However, no animal will know the difference. The difference between a slow and fast barrel will be far greater than 2 inches of barrel.
 
Would you care to elaborate?

I haven't been able to get the speed and therefore the performance out of it as I do my rifles with 24" barrels.

Getting everything out of a cartridge may not matter to some folks, but it does to me.
 
Great choice. The ol' 270 has lost some love to the 6.5s and 7 mms, but it remains an excellent option for 30-06 power w better ballistics and less recoil. IMO it is a better choice for elk-size game than the 6.5s, and is faster than 7-08 w same weight bullets. I tried 160, 150, and settled on 140 gr partition bullets for elk @ ranges to 300+ yds. Other rifles prefer monos or bonded bullets. For longer shots @ elk-size game, my 7 RM is ballistically the 270 plus 100 yards, w any bullet weight. A light 270 will throw some recoil, so a quality pad is helpful. Good luck. BTW, 22 in. barrel on my Stevens 200 270, very handy size.

I have both a 270 and a 6.5 CM and most of the time it's just a matter of which one I feel like packing that day. I've worked up a good elk load for my 270 where I haven't yet for my 6.5 so that's what I'll be taking this year. Next trip I make may be with a new 6.5mm, the question is do I build a 6.5 GAP 4S or buy a Browning x-bolt hells canyon in 26 Nosler?
 
I like having the muzzle blast being 2-4 inches further from my ears. As far as having a 24 or 26 inch barrel being clumsy, I have never heard of a shotgun with a 26 inch barrel being called that. GJ
 
I started with a 22 inch barrel on a ruger tanger 3006 and hunted with it 25 years. So thats my prefered length. My present Rem 700 xcrii has a 24. I am geting used to it but still seems long. I would chop it to 22 but it has that trinyte coating on from remington and I worry that cutting it will somehow mess that up and I dont think it can easily be repaired. I dont hate the extra 2 inches enough to mess with it.
 
24" on my 270win. I wouldn't change a thing on it. Worked up a great load for it years ago with the Nosler Accubond 140g.
 
I guess I'm psychologically bent for at least a 24" but not longer than 26. The 22" Montana 7-08 I traded away never felt 'right'....I know, crazy, but it is what it is.
 
PEAX Trekking Poles

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
111,057
Messages
1,945,286
Members
34,995
Latest member
Infraredice
Back
Top