MT FWP New Director

Eric Albus said:

tjones, yes

Click to expand...

Eric Albus said:

antler, don't know about their ever being 42 districts in 700. But if you look at some of the maps there are 5-6 boundaries laid out already, 701-705, if memory serves correct. This would be simple to allot a number of tags to each area according to antelope populations.

Click to expand...

Eric Albus said:

team, I agree with that.

tjones, I do not know that I would have asked that question had it been a man, on account that I would ignorantly assume that all MEN hunt....

Ben, I can agree that it may not matter.....and I hope it does not matter.

Is she anti-hunting? Maybe that would have been a better question, or would it matter?

Click to expand...

tjones said:

And assuming most women don't?

Click to expand...

MTGomer said:

6-8% of Americans hunt. Of the aprox 14 million people that make up the 8% (depending which stat you use), around 11% of them are women. So no, 'most' women don't. Neither do most men.

Click to expand...

MTGomer said:

and he would still be correct.

Click to expand...

teamhoyt said:

2ski. All regions are split into districts or units. In the case of doe deer and antelope tags have in the past been allocated region wide. No sideboards at all. Now region 7 encompasses a huge chunk of the state. When thousands of tags are issued not one thing is keeping every hunter from showing up in broadus, circle or baker to hunt. I believe that an area the size of region 7 in order to be managed needs a population count In each district and tags issued for that district accordingly. I Would like to see deer doe tags taken one step further and be primarily issued for private land in the districts that warrant doe tags

Click to expand...